šØ INDIANA: THIS ISNāT MERELY āINAPPROPRIATE.ā IT MAY CROSS MULTIPLE LEGAL LINES.
A member of our community alerted us to this public announcement from LifeWise Whitko.
šØLifeWise says its director and teacher will begin entering Whitko Jr/Sr High School in South Whitley during lunchtime to ābuild relationshipsā with middle-school students.
Its classes have not even started.
LifeWise admits it is still working out the scheduleābut it is already advertising direct access to children inside a public school and immediately telling families to āPRE-ENROLL NOW.ā
That is full on recruitment. And depending on what Whitko Community Schools has authorized, several serious legal and policy issues are now on the table.
š© RELEASED TIME IS SUPPOSED TO OCCUR OUTSIDE THE PUBLIC SCHOOL.
Released-time religious instruction is constitutionally permitted because students leave the public school and the school merely accommodates their schedules.
The Supreme Court struck down a program in which outside religious instructors entered public schools during the school day. It later upheld a different program specifically because the religious instruction occurred off school property.
LifeWise cannot use an off-campus religious-instruction law as a doorway for bringing its ministry back inside the school.
If these visits include Bible lessons, prayer, evangelism or religious persuasion, that is not simply a āmeet and greet.ā It raises a direct First Amendment problem.
š© INDIANA LAW PROHIBITS PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR THE RELIGIOUS PROVIDER.
Indiana Code §20-33-2-19 states that an entity providing released-time religious instruction āmay not be supported, in whole or in part, by public funds.ā
So what publicly funded space, employee time, supervision, announcements, technology or other school resources will be used to facilitate these recruitment visits?
The public deserves an accounting.
š© A PUBLIC SCHOOL MAY NOT GIVE ONE RELIGION PREFERENTIAL ACCESS.
If LifeWise is being granted access to the cafeteria and direct access to students that comparable religious, nonreligious and community organizations are not offered, that raises another serious constitutional problem.
Would Whitko provide the same opportunity to representatives of a Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, humanist or Satanist organization?
Could they also enter during lunch, approach students, ābuild relationshipsā and recruit them into their programs?
If the answer is no, then this is not neutrality. It is religious favoritism.
š© THE EQUAL ACCESS ACT IS NOT A FREE PASS FOR OUTSIDE ADULTS TO RECRUIT CHILDREN.
STUDENTS have the right to organize and participate in religious clubs during noninstructional time. But this announcement is not describing students voluntarily gathering with one another.
šIt describes adult representatives of an outside evangelical organization entering the school to cultivate relationships with students and increase enrollment in their program.
Federal law specifically distinguishes student-led religious activity from activities directed or controlled by outside adults.š
š© WHERE IS THE PARENTAL CONSENT?
Indianaās released-time process begins when a parent provides written notice requesting that their child attend religious instruction.
So will LifeWise representatives interact only with students whose parents have already enrolled them?
Or will they be permitted to approach children whose parents have never consented to any contact with LifeWise?
āCome say hiā is not an adequate child-safety or parental-consent policy.
Whitko Community Schools must disclose:
ā”ļø Who authorized these visits?
ā”ļø What exactly will LifeWise personnel be permitted to say and do?
ā”ļø Which students may be approached?
ā”ļø Will prior parental consent be required?
ā”ļø Have the LifeWise representatives completed every visitor and background-check requirement?
ā”ļø What school space, staff time and public resources will be used?
ā”ļø What other outside organizations have been offered equivalent access?
ā”ļø What written policy permits a ministry to recruit students during the school day?
The announcement alone cannot tell us precisely which legal line Whitko has crossed. That is why the district must provide records and answers before these visits begin.
But LifeWiseās own words establish its purpose: It wants to enter a public school, ābuild relationshipsā with children and convert that access into enrollment.
A public-school cafeteria is not an evangelical ministryās recruiting station.
āReleased timeā does not mean released from constitutional scrutiny.
What people are saying:
- Facebook User: But why would you want to enroll your child in this grooming program? Take them to the church or temple or masque of your choice…outside of their public school day. Do not fall for this program and it’s lies.
- Facebook User: That flyer is… sure something.
- Facebook User: Child predators running around a school lunchroom. What could go wrong?
- Facebook User: They would use AI
- Facebook User: Facebook User is it? I thought it was a very poorly done canva flyer, but AI would make sense too
- Facebook User: Rosie is not known for her grammar.
- Facebook User: If I ever have children and these people try to win them over, theyād better HOPE theyāre right about a merciful god.
- Facebook User: Facebook User Tbh, one reason I never had kids is that I knew Iād never be able to insulate them from religious indoctrination. Iām in Ohio. At least whatever gets thrown at me, Iām an adult with convictions and the ability to reason, I can take it, but a kid can be swayed easily.
- Facebook User: They have done it in Ohio and itās everywhere, based on laws in OH. They take kids out of school during a time of non-education(PE, lunch, study hall) with parental consent. They bus them to off campus location. Usually a consenting church. The kids that donāt go have been known to be bullied by the kids enrolled in LifeWise.
Iām all for separation of church and state. I have no issues with kids being educated at school or attending religious programs after school hours.
There have been issues in OH with leaders involved with LifeWise, such as sexual misconduct around a minor.
These people are not vetted like teachers or those who work in churches, such as in depth background checks.
Both my husband and myself had to be FBI fingerprinted and background checks for our job requirements. - Facebook User: The new Hitler Youth š
- Facebook User: But itās the queer people who are the groomers, letās remember š
- Facebook User: This thing is religious bullshit being imposed on a public school. These vultures need to stay in their own lane.


Leave a Reply