🚨 STEUBENVILLE CITY SCHOOLS, THIS NEEDS AN EXPLANATION.

✅Students have a constitutional right to pray.

🚫The school district does not get to turn itself into the prayer leader.

Yet the official Steubenville City Schools page didn’t say students are holding a prayer event.

It said:

“JOIN US as WE come together in prayer.”

Then the official high school page tells us FCA meets during both lunch periods, thanks adults for helping “lead FCA,” and says FCA holds a “voluntary devotional with the Big Red football team in the locker room before each game”—with the entire team participating.

That last part should make every parent ask questions…

-Who leads the locker-room devotional?

-Who are the adults “helping lead” FCA?

-Are coaches participating?

-Who organized today’s noon prayer inside the school?

👉Because federal guidance is remarkably clear: public-school teachers, coaches, and other officials acting in their official capacities may not lead students in prayer, devotional readings, or other religious activities.

And please spare us the word “voluntary.”
“Voluntary” doesn’t tell us who is standing at the front of that locker room. It doesn’t tell us whether a coach is participating. And it doesn’t tell us what it feels like to be the one teenager expected to decline when “the entire team” participates.

Student prayer is protected. School-sponsored religious exercise is a different matter.

Steubenville City Schools published these claims themselves. Now parents and students deserve to know exactly who is doing the preaching. 💁‍♀️


What people are saying:

  • Facebook User: Why are these posts of the Secular Education Association always against something. Against prayer, against LifeWise, against first amendment freedom of religion unless it fits in a narrowly defined box. What are they promoting, anything positive?
    • Secular Education Association: Facebook User We are promoting religious freedom. That’s the entire point.

      Students praying voluntarily? Protected.

      Students forming religious clubs? Protected.

      Students expressing their faith at school? Protected.

      A public school district using its institutional voice to invite students to pray? Different issue.

      Public-school employees leading students in devotional religious exercises? Different issue.

      Government promoting one religion to other people’s children? Different issue.

      The First Amendment protects your right to practice your religion. It does not require a public school to practice, promote, or lead it with you.
      And that isn’t a “narrowly defined box.” That distinction is what allows a Christian student, Muslim student, Jewish student, atheist student, and everyone else to walk into the same public school with their freedom of conscience intact.

      So yes, we are very much FOR something: Religious freedom for everyone — not government promotion of religion for some.

  • Facebook User: grooming our children
  • Facebook User: Isn’t this the school that tried to cover up one of its students getting raped?
  • Facebook User: Evangelicals have NO shame

View original post on Facebook

Discover more from Secular Education Association

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading