Delphi, Indiana: This Was Never About “Religious Freedom.” It Was About Power.

What happened in Delphi this week was not confusion about the law.
It was not a misunderstanding.

And it was not a neutral community conversation.

It was a coordinated pressure campaign — and the public record makes that clear.

Delphi Community School Corporation did the right thing.
After receiving a formal complaint, the district reviewed binding federal precedent and correctly concluded that religious instruction may not take place on public school property during the school day. That conclusion reflects decades of settled Establishment Clause law, including McCollum v. Board of Education and Zorach v. Clauson.

No serious legal authority disputes this.

🚨What followed should concern anyone who cares about public schools.

A so-called “community meeting” was convened — not at city hall, not in a school board room, not in a neutral civic space — but inside a church, opened with prayer, and dominated by religious and political actors openly hostile to constitutional compliance.
The meeting reflected a multi-church effort, with pastors and members from more than one congregation, including the church hosting the meeting and another church located directly across the street.

That meeting was publicly promoted by Dale Seward, a sitting city councilman, who used his elected title to legitimize what was in reality a religiously partisan advocacy event aimed at pressuring a public school district to reverse a legally required decision.

The meeting was led and framed by Mike Williams, pastor of Hope Community Church and a local organizer of the religious education program, who told attendees that the “long-term solution” is to restore religious instruction on school property during the school day — the very practice courts have repeatedly ruled unconstitutional.

Attendees were then addressed by Tyson Priest, appearing on behalf of Indiana’s Lieutenant Governor Micah Beckwith. Priest told the audience that the Lieutenant Governor’s office supports their efforts, claimed that Attorney General Todd Rokita’s office is “not okay with” the letter and email that prompted the district to halt on-campus religious instruction, and named Senators Jeff Raatz and Blake Doriot — the chair and vice chair of Indiana’s Senate Education Committee — as legislators who are “not okay with this.”

While repeatedly stating that he was not an attorney and would not discuss legality, Priest nonetheless described ongoing efforts to change state law and identified Alliance Defending Freedom as the organization positioned to handle legal escalation.

Let that sink in.

At this meeting, speakers openly acknowledged:

The law does not allow religious instruction on school property
The goal is to restore it anyway
The plan is to change the law, not comply with it

This is not speculation.

We attended this meeting, recorded it in full, and we are releasing the complete audio and transcripts so the public can hear exactly what was said — in context, start to finish.

That is not religious liberty.
That is political coercion.

Rather than addressing the constitutional issue, compliance with the law was framed as “bullying.” The rights of non-Christian students were dismissed. Other religions were treated as inconveniences. Public schools were described as belonging to “the community” — meaning whichever religious group is loudest, most organized, and well-funded.

Students who do not participate were barely mentioned at all.

The religious instruction discussed at this meeting is a locally operated released-time religious instruction (RTRI) program, organized by area churches. It is not affiliated with LifeWise Academy, which was mentioned only briefly as a separate, potential option by Priest.

While appearing on behalf of Indiana’s Lieutenant Governor, Priest nevertheless introduced LifeWise Academy as an alternative and repeated its self-described “accreditation,” despite being unable or unwilling to explain what that meant or who granted it. When pressed, he deferred entirely to LifeWise’s own website and declined to stand behind the claim. That is not neutral context — it is the casual promotion of a national religious program by a state official’s representative.

Public schools are not churches.
They are not mission fields.

And they do not belong to elected officials, pastors, or political offices.

The district followed the law.
The backlash we’re witnessing now proves exactly why those constitutional guardrails exist.

When elected officials and state representatives help funnel public pressure through religious spaces to override settled law, that is not community engagement.

It is state-endorsed religious entanglement.

And it deserves to be called out.
—
For background on how this started — including the original complaint and the district’s written response — see our December 17 post here https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1HX3kR6KK6/

Full audio recording and verbatim transcripts are linked below.
We encourage everyone — supporters and critics alike — to listen for themselves.

Transcript
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v-AVqzvaky64P1lR50mwGRtRoYpRcS31/view?usp=sharing

---

View original post on Facebook